HOSA Parliamentary Procedure Assessment Practice Test 2025 - Free Parliamentary Procedure Practice Questions and Study Guide

A motion is considered "out of order" when it violates parliamentary rules or bylaws. This means that if a motion contradicts established protocols or the governing documents of the organization, it cannot be accepted for consideration. Each organization typically has specific rules that dictate how meetings are to be conducted, and motions must align with these guidelines to be valid.

For example, certain motions may require a specific number of votes or may have to be presented in a particular order. If a motion is introduced that ignores these requirements or introduces confusion or conflict with existing laws, it cannot proceed.

The other conditions mentioned do not universally categorize a motion as "out of order." A motion made by the chairperson may still be valid, depending on the rules governing the meeting. Interrupting a meeting, such as during discussion, does not automatically mean a motion is out of order; it may be appropriate in some situations (like during a point of order). Lastly, a motion that is not seconded simply means it will not advance for discussion, but the lack of a second does not render it out of order in itself.